Pricing Calculator
Estimate your monthly Azure OpenAI costs with an interactive calculator covering every available model.
Pricing data updated daily. Azure pricing aligns with direct OpenAI API rates.
Cost per request
$0.0000
Daily cost
$0.00
Monthly cost (30 days)
$0.00
| Model | Input / 1M tokens | Output / 1M tokens | Intelligence Index | Tier |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPT-5.3 Codex (xhigh) | $1.75 | $14.00 | 54.0 | Frontier |
| GPT-5.2 (xhigh) | $1.75 | $14.00 | 51.3 | Frontier |
| GPT-5.2 Codex (xhigh) | $1.75 | $14.00 | 49.0 | Frontier |
| GPT-5.1 (high) | $1.25 | $10.00 | 47.7 | Frontier |
| GPT-5.2 (medium) | $1.75 | $14.00 | 46.6 | Frontier |
| GPT-5 (high) | $1.25 | $10.00 | 44.6 | Frontier |
| GPT-5 Codex (high) | $1.25 | $10.00 | 44.6 | Frontier |
| GPT-5.1 Codex (high) | $1.25 | $10.00 | 43.1 | Frontier |
| GPT-5 (medium) | $1.25 | $10.00 | 42.0 | Frontier |
| GPT-5 mini (high) | $0.25 | $2.00 | 41.2 | Frontier |
| o3-pro | $20.00 | $80.00 | 40.7 | Frontier |
| GPT-5 (low) | $1.25 | $10.00 | 39.2 | Mid-tier |
| GPT-5 mini (medium) | $0.25 | $2.00 | 38.9 | Mid-tier |
| GPT-5.1 Codex mini (high) | $0.25 | $2.00 | 38.6 | Mid-tier |
| o3 | $2.00 | $8.00 | 38.4 | Mid-tier |
| GPT-5.2 (Non-reasoning) | $1.75 | $14.00 | 33.6 | Mid-tier |
| gpt-oss-120B (high) | $0.04 | $0.19 | 33.3 | Mid-tier |
| o4-mini (high) | $1.10 | $4.40 | 33.1 | Mid-tier |
| o1 | $15.00 | $60.00 | 30.8 | Mid-tier |
| GPT-5.1 (Non-reasoning) | $1.25 | $10.00 | 27.4 | Mid-tier |
| GPT-5 nano (high) | $0.05 | $0.40 | 26.8 | Mid-tier |
| GPT-4.1 | $2.00 | $8.00 | 26.3 | Mid-tier |
| GPT-5 nano (medium) | $0.05 | $0.40 | 25.9 | Mid-tier |
| o3-mini | $1.10 | $4.40 | 25.9 | Mid-tier |
| o1-pro | $150.00 | $600.00 | 25.8 | Mid-tier |
| o3-mini (high) | $1.10 | $4.40 | 25.2 | Mid-tier |
| gpt-oss-20B (high) | $0.03 | $0.14 | 24.5 | Budget |
| gpt-oss-120B (low) | $0.04 | $0.19 | 24.5 | Budget |
| GPT-5 (minimal) | $1.25 | $10.00 | 23.9 | Budget |
| o1-preview | $15.00 | $60.00 | 23.7 | Budget |
| GPT-4.1 mini | $0.40 | $1.60 | 22.9 | Budget |
| GPT-5 (ChatGPT) | $1.25 | $10.00 | 21.8 | Budget |
| gpt-oss-20B (low) | $0.03 | $0.14 | 20.8 | Budget |
| GPT-5 mini (minimal) | $0.25 | $2.00 | 20.7 | Budget |
| o1-mini | $1.10 | $4.40 | 20.4 | Budget |
| GPT-4o | $2.50 | $10.00 | 18.6 | Budget |
| GPT-4o | $2.50 | $10.00 | 17.3 | Budget |
| GPT-5 nano (minimal) | $0.05 | $0.40 | 15.6 | Budget |
| GPT-4.1 nano | $0.10 | $0.40 | 14.9 | Budget |
| GPT-4o | $5.00 | $15.00 | 14.5 | Budget |
| GPT-4 Turbo | $10.00 | $30.00 | 13.7 | Budget |
| GPT-4 | $30.00 | $60.00 | 12.8 | Budget |
| GPT-4o mini | $0.15 | $0.60 | 12.6 | Budget |
| GPT-3.5 Turbo | $0.50 | $1.50 | 9.0 | Budget |
Azure OpenAI Service and the direct OpenAI API use the same underlying models with the same per-token pricing. GPT-4o, GPT-4.1, o3, o4-mini, and every other model cost the same whether you call them through Azure or through api.openai.com. The pricing table above applies to both platforms.
Where Azure differs is in what surrounds the API. Azure OpenAI runs inside your Azure subscription, so you get VNet integration, private endpoints, managed identity authentication, content filtering, regional data residency, and your existing Azure support plan with SLA-backed response times. For regulated industries like healthcare and finance, these features can be requirements rather than nice-to-haves. Enterprise Agreement customers may also negotiate volume discounts not available on the direct API.
If your only concern is per-token cost, the two platforms are interchangeable. If you need enterprise compliance, network isolation, data residency control, or want to consolidate billing under an existing Azure contract, Azure OpenAI is the better fit. The calculator above works for either platform since the base pricing is the same.
Azure OpenAI charges appear on your regular Azure invoice alongside compute, storage, and other services. There is no separate bill from OpenAI. Charges are metered like any other Azure consumption resource, which simplifies accounting for organizations already managing Azure spending through cost centers, departments, or resource groups.
Azure OpenAI offers two billing models: pay-as-you-go and Provisioned Throughput Units (PTUs). Pay-as-you-go is the default — you pay per token with separate rates for input and output, no minimum commitments, and no upfront costs. This works well for development, testing, and variable workloads where request volume is unpredictable. The calculator above uses pay-as-you-go rates.
PTUs are a reserved capacity model for production workloads with sustained traffic. You purchase a fixed amount of throughput measured in PTUs, billed hourly regardless of utilization — similar to reserved VM instances. The trade-off: predictable costs and guaranteed throughput in exchange for paying for capacity you might not fully use. PTUs can reduce per-token costs by 50% or more at high utilization, but generally only make financial sense once you consistently use 60-70% or more of the provisioned capacity.
Azure OpenAI also distinguishes between Standard and Provisioned deployments, and between Global and Regional routing. Standard deployments use pay-as-you-go billing with shared infrastructure — best-effort throughput that may experience rate limiting under high demand. Provisioned deployments reserve dedicated compute with consistent latency, available with monthly or annual commitments. Global deployments route to the nearest data center for better availability; Regional deployments pin your model to a specific Azure region for data residency control. Per-token rates are the same for both Global and Regional Standard deployments.
All three major cloud providers offer managed access to large language models, but each takes a different approach. Azure OpenAI provides exclusive access to OpenAI's models (GPT-4o, GPT-4.1, o3, o4-mini, and others) with deep integration into the Microsoft ecosystem — Azure Active Directory authentication, VNet networking, and consolidated billing under your existing Azure agreement.
AWS Bedrock takes a multi-model marketplace approach. Through a single API, you can access models from Anthropic (Claude), Meta (Llama), Mistral, Cohere, and Amazon (Titan and Nova). Bedrock does not offer OpenAI models. Its advantage is vendor diversity: you can test and switch between providers without changing infrastructure. Pricing varies by model provider, and Bedrock adds its own margin on top of base model costs.
Google Vertex AI provides native access to Gemini models alongside third-party models from Anthropic, Meta, and Mistral through its Model Garden. Its differentiator is tight integration with Google Cloud's data and ML infrastructure, including BigQuery and TPU hardware. Gemini models offer competitive pricing and large context windows (up to 1 million tokens for some variants).
The three platforms are not directly comparable because they offer different models at different rates. The right choice depends on which models you need, which cloud you already use, and what enterprise features matter to your organization. Many teams end up using more than one provider, which is where per-customer cost tracking across providers becomes essential.
The most common question when budgeting for Azure OpenAI is: how many tokens will my application actually use? Token counts depend on the use case, prompt length, and how much output you request. Below are practical ranges based on typical production workloads that you can plug into the calculator above.
Chat applications typically consume 500 to 2,000 input tokens per turn, including the system prompt, conversation history, and the user's message. As conversations grow longer, input tokens increase because the full history is sent with each request. A 10-turn conversation can reach 4,000 to 6,000 input tokens on the final turn. Output tokens per turn usually range from 200 to 1,000. To control costs, consider truncating or summarizing conversation history after a certain number of turns.
Document summarization scales directly with document length — a short document might use 1,000 to 2,000 input tokens, while a long report can consume 5,000 to 50,000 or more. Output tokens for summaries are modest, typically 200 to 800. Documents exceeding a model's context window require a chunking strategy, meaning multiple API calls and proportionally higher costs.
RAG (retrieval-augmented generation) adds retrieved context chunks to each prompt, pushing input tokens higher. A typical RAG request includes the system prompt, user query, and 3 to 10 retrieved text chunks, totaling 2,000 to 8,000 input tokens. This can reach 20,000 to 50,000 tokens with large passages or many chunks.
Code generation typically uses 500 to 3,000 input tokens and 300 to 2,000 output tokens. Complex tasks with extensive codebase context push input tokens much higher. Classification and extraction tasks are the most token-efficient, often using only 200 to 1,000 input tokens and 50 to 200 output tokens per request — but at high volumes, these small per-request costs still add up.
Azure provides several built-in tools for controlling spending. Azure Cost Management and Billing shows consumption broken down by resource group, subscription, or tag. Budget alerts notify you via email or trigger Azure Actions when spending approaches a threshold — essential because Azure OpenAI costs can spike if a new feature drives unexpected token volume or a bug causes retry loops.
Azure Policy can enforce governance rules: restrict which models can be deployed, limit deployments to specific regions, or require cost center tags on all Azure OpenAI resources. Resource tags are critical for cost attribution — tagging each deployment with the team, application, or environment it serves lets you break down costs in reports. Rate limiting via tokens-per-minute (TPM) caps on each deployment prevents any single application from consuming more than its allocated share.
What Azure's built-in tools do not provide is per-customer cost attribution. Azure Cost Management can tell you how much a specific deployment consumed, but not which of your end customers drove that consumption. If you are building a product that makes Azure OpenAI calls on behalf of customers, you need application-level tracking that ties each API call to a customer ID. MarginDash fills this gap: it tracks token usage per customer, connects it to revenue data, and shows you which customers are profitable after AI costs.
The hardest part of estimating Azure OpenAI costs is knowing how many tokens each request uses. Here are typical ranges to help you calibrate the calculator:
Averages can be misleading when usage is skewed — a single customer running long-context RAG queries can use more tokens than a hundred customers running classification tasks. Estimate costs for your heaviest use case separately rather than averaging across all request types. The calculator above lets you model each use case individually, and you can sum the results for a more accurate total.
If you're already running Azure OpenAI in production, MarginDash can track your actual token usage per customer and show you exactly what each customer costs.
Stop estimating. MarginDash tracks your real token usage per customer, connects to Stripe for revenue, and shows you margin per customer across all AI providers.
Start Tracking CostsNo credit card required
Create an account, install the SDK, and see your first margin data in minutes.
See My Margin DataNo credit card required