Model Comparison

Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Grok 3 mini Reasoning (high)

Google vs xAI

Side-by-side benchmarks, pricing, and value analysis. See which model costs less per intelligence point.

Gemini 2.5 Pro (Google) and Grok 3 mini Reasoning (high) (xAI) are both large language models available via API. On list price, Grok 3 mini Reasoning (high) is cheaper, while Gemini 2.5 Pro scores higher on benchmarks. When you factor in token efficiency — how many tokens each model needs for the same task — Gemini 2.5 Pro delivers more intelligence per dollar. List prices can be misleading because different models consume different numbers of tokens for the same work. The effective costs below adjust for this using benchmark data, so you can compare what equivalent work actually costs.

Benchmark Scores

Intelligence Index

Gemini 2.5 Pro 34.5
Grok 3 mini Reasoning (high) 32.0

MMLU-Pro

Gemini 2.5 Pro 0.9
Grok 3 mini Reasoning (high) 0.8

GPQA

Gemini 2.5 Pro 0.8
Grok 3 mini Reasoning (high) 0.8

AIME

Gemini 2.5 Pro 0.9
Grok 3 mini Reasoning (high) 0.9

Performance

Metric Gemini 2.5 Pro Grok 3 mini Reasoning (high) Gap
Output tokens/sec 159.0 173.7 1.1x
Time to first token 35.38s 0.70s 50.3x
Context window 32,000 2,000,000 62.5x

Pricing per 1M Tokens

Metric Gemini 2.5 Pro Grok 3 mini Reasoning (high) Gap
Input price / 1M tokens $1.25 $0.3 4.2x
Output price / 1M tokens $10.0 $0.5 20.0x
Cache hit price / 1M tokens $0.3 $1.25 4.2x

Effective Cost per 1M Tokens

List prices adjusted for token efficiency. Different models use different numbers of tokens for the same task — these prices reflect what equivalent work actually costs.

Metric Gemini 2.5 Pro Grok 3 mini Reasoning (high) Gap
Input (adjusted) / 1M $0.9152 $0.4098 2.2x
Output (adjusted) / 1M $0.8628 $5.7951 6.7x
Input token ratio 0.73x 1.37x
Output token ratio 0.09x 11.59x

Intelligence vs Price

Higher is smarter, further left is cheaper. Top-left is best value. Prices adjusted for token efficiency.

15 20 25 30 35 40 $5 $10 $20 $50 $100 $200 Effective $/1M tokens (input + output) Intelligence Index Claude 4.5 Sonn... GPT-4.1 Gemini 2.5 Flas... Claude 4 Sonnet... GPT-4.1 mini DeepSeek R1 052... Gemini 2.5 Pro Grok 3 mini Reasoning (high)
Gemini 2.5 Pro Grok 3 mini Reasoning (high) Other models

Value Analysis

Cheaper

Grok 3 mini Reasoning (high)

Higher Benchmarks

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Better Value ($/IQ point)

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Gemini 2.5 Pro

$0.05 / IQ point

Grok 3 mini Reasoning (high)

$0.19 / IQ point

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Pro or Grok 3 mini Reasoning (high)?

Grok 3 mini Reasoning (high) is cheaper on list price. Gemini 2.5 Pro costs $1.25/M input and $10.0/M output tokens. Grok 3 mini Reasoning (high) costs $0.3/M input and $0.5/M output tokens. On combined list price, Grok 3 mini Reasoning (high) is 14.1x cheaper than Gemini 2.5 Pro. However, list prices alone can be misleading because different models use different numbers of tokens for the same task. Check the effective cost comparison above, which adjusts for token efficiency using benchmark data.

Which scores higher on benchmarks, Gemini 2.5 Pro or Grok 3 mini Reasoning (high)?

Gemini 2.5 Pro has a higher Intelligence Index (34.5) compared to Grok 3 mini Reasoning (high) (32.0). The Intelligence Index is a composite score from three industry-standard benchmarks: MMLU-Pro (general knowledge and reasoning), GPQA (graduate-level science), and AIME (mathematical problem solving). A higher score means the model produces more accurate and capable responses across a broad range of tasks. This composite approach is more reliable than any single benchmark because it measures different types of capability.

Which model is better value for money, Gemini 2.5 Pro or Grok 3 mini Reasoning (high)?

Gemini 2.5 Pro offers better value at $0.05 per intelligence point compared to Grok 3 mini Reasoning (high) at $0.19 per intelligence point. Cost per intelligence point measures how much you pay for each unit of benchmark performance, calculated as the combined token cost divided by the Intelligence Index score. When token efficiency data is available, this calculation uses effective prices (adjusted for the fact that different models consume different numbers of tokens for the same task) rather than raw list prices. A lower cost per intelligence point means you get more capability per dollar.

Which has a larger context window, Gemini 2.5 Pro or Grok 3 mini Reasoning (high)?

Grok 3 mini Reasoning (high) supports 2,000,000 tokens compared to Gemini 2.5 Pro with 32,000 tokens. The context window determines how much text (including your prompt, conversation history, and documents) the model can process in a single request. A larger context window is important for tasks like document summarization, long-form analysis, and multi-turn conversations with extensive history. If your use case involves processing large inputs, the context window may be a deciding factor.

Related Comparisons

Stop guessing. Start measuring.

Create an account, install the SDK, and see your first margin data in minutes.

See My Margin Data

No credit card required