Model Comparison

DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25) vs GPT-4.1 mini

DeepSeek vs OpenAI

Side-by-side benchmarks, pricing, and value analysis. See which model costs less per intelligence point.

DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25) (DeepSeek) and GPT-4.1 mini (OpenAI) are both large language models available via API. On list price, GPT-4.1 mini is cheaper, while DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25) scores higher on benchmarks. When you factor in token efficiency — how many tokens each model needs for the same task — GPT-4.1 mini delivers more intelligence per dollar. List prices can be misleading because different models consume different numbers of tokens for the same work. The effective costs below adjust for this using benchmark data, so you can compare what equivalent work actually costs.

Benchmark Scores

Intelligence Index

DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25) 27.0
GPT-4.1 mini 22.4

MMLU-Pro

DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25) 0.8
GPT-4.1 mini 0.8

GPQA

DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25) 0.8
GPT-4.1 mini 0.7

AIME

DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25) 0.9
GPT-4.1 mini 0.4

Performance

Metric DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25) GPT-4.1 mini Gap
Output tokens/sec N/A 74.1
Time to first token N/A 0.46s
Context window 128,000 200,000 1.6x

Pricing per 1M Tokens

Metric DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25) GPT-4.1 mini Gap
Input price / 1M tokens $1.35 $0.4 3.4x
Output price / 1M tokens $4.2 $1.6 2.6x
Cache hit price / 1M tokens $0.75 $0.075 10.0x

Effective Cost per 1M Tokens

List prices adjusted for token efficiency. Different models use different numbers of tokens for the same task — these prices reflect what equivalent work actually costs.

Metric DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25) GPT-4.1 mini Gap
Input (adjusted) / 1M $11.2071 $0.0482 232.5x
Output (adjusted) / 1M $1.049 $6.4061 6.1x
Input token ratio 8.30x 0.12x
Output token ratio 0.25x 4.00x

Intelligence vs Price

Higher is smarter, further left is cheaper. Top-left is best value. Prices adjusted for token efficiency.

15 20 25 30 35 40 $1 $2 $5 $10 $20 $50 $100 Effective $/1M tokens (input + output) Intelligence Index Claude 4.5 Sonn... Gemini 2.5 Pro Grok 3 mini Rea... GPT-4.1 Gemini 2.5 Flas... Claude 4 Sonnet... DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25) GPT-4.1 mini
DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25) GPT-4.1 mini Other models

Value Analysis

Cheaper

GPT-4.1 mini

Higher Benchmarks

DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25)

Better Value ($/IQ point)

GPT-4.1 mini

DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25)

$0.45 / IQ point

GPT-4.1 mini

$0.29 / IQ point

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25) or GPT-4.1 mini?

GPT-4.1 mini is cheaper on list price. DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25) costs $1.35/M input and $4.2/M output tokens. GPT-4.1 mini costs $0.4/M input and $1.6/M output tokens. On combined list price, GPT-4.1 mini is 2.8x cheaper than DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25). However, list prices alone can be misleading because different models use different numbers of tokens for the same task. Check the effective cost comparison above, which adjusts for token efficiency using benchmark data.

Which scores higher on benchmarks, DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25) or GPT-4.1 mini?

DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25) has a higher Intelligence Index (27.0) compared to GPT-4.1 mini (22.4). The Intelligence Index is a composite score from three industry-standard benchmarks: MMLU-Pro (general knowledge and reasoning), GPQA (graduate-level science), and AIME (mathematical problem solving). A higher score means the model produces more accurate and capable responses across a broad range of tasks. This composite approach is more reliable than any single benchmark because it measures different types of capability.

Which model is better value for money, DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25) or GPT-4.1 mini?

GPT-4.1 mini offers better value at $0.29 per intelligence point compared to DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25) at $0.45 per intelligence point. Cost per intelligence point measures how much you pay for each unit of benchmark performance, calculated as the combined token cost divided by the Intelligence Index score. When token efficiency data is available, this calculation uses effective prices (adjusted for the fact that different models consume different numbers of tokens for the same task) rather than raw list prices. A lower cost per intelligence point means you get more capability per dollar.

Which has a larger context window, DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25) or GPT-4.1 mini?

GPT-4.1 mini supports 200,000 tokens compared to DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25) with 128,000 tokens. The context window determines how much text (including your prompt, conversation history, and documents) the model can process in a single request. A larger context window is important for tasks like document summarization, long-form analysis, and multi-turn conversations with extensive history. If your use case involves processing large inputs, the context window may be a deciding factor.

Related Comparisons

Stop guessing. Start measuring.

Create an account, install the SDK, and see your first margin data in minutes.

See My Margin Data

No credit card required