Model Comparison

Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Mistral Large 2 (Nov '24)

Anthropic vs Mistral

Side-by-side benchmarks, pricing, and value analysis. See which model costs less per intelligence point.

Claude 3.5 Haiku (Anthropic) and Mistral Large 2 (Nov '24) (Mistral) are both large language models available via API. On list price, Claude 3.5 Haiku is cheaper, while Claude 3.5 Haiku scores higher on benchmarks. When you factor in token efficiency — how many tokens each model needs for the same task — Claude 3.5 Haiku delivers more intelligence per dollar. List prices can be misleading because different models consume different numbers of tokens for the same work. The effective costs below adjust for this using benchmark data, so you can compare what equivalent work actually costs.

Benchmark Scores

Intelligence Index

Claude 3.5 Haiku 18.7
Mistral Large 2 (Nov '24) 15.1

MMLU-Pro

Claude 3.5 Haiku 0.6
Mistral Large 2 (Nov '24) 0.7

GPQA

Claude 3.5 Haiku 0.4
Mistral Large 2 (Nov '24) 0.5

AIME

Claude 3.5 Haiku 0.0
Mistral Large 2 (Nov '24) 0.1

Performance

Metric Claude 3.5 Haiku Mistral Large 2 (Nov '24) Gap
Output tokens/sec 47.6 44.8 1.1x
Time to first token 0.76s 0.48s 1.6x
Context window 200,000 128,000 1.6x

Pricing per 1M Tokens

Metric Claude 3.5 Haiku Mistral Large 2 (Nov '24) Gap
Input price / 1M tokens $0.8 $2.0 2.5x
Output price / 1M tokens $4.0 $6.0 1.5x
Cache hit price / 1M tokens $0.025 $0.028 1.1x

Intelligence vs Price

Higher is smarter, further left is cheaper. Top-left is best value.

10 15 20 25 30 35 40 $1 $2 $5 $10 $20 Combined $/1M tokens (input + output) Intelligence Index Claude 4.5 Sonn... Gemini 2.5 Pro Grok 3 mini Rea... GPT-4.1 Gemini 2.5 Flas... Claude 4 Sonnet... GPT-4.1 mini DeepSeek R1 052... Claude 3.5 Haiku Mistral Large 2 (Nov '24)
Claude 3.5 Haiku Mistral Large 2 (Nov '24) Other models

Value Analysis

Cheaper

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Higher Benchmarks

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Better Value ($/IQ point)

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Claude 3.5 Haiku

$0.26 / IQ point

Mistral Large 2 (Nov '24)

$0.53 / IQ point

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Claude 3.5 Haiku or Mistral Large 2 (Nov '24)?

Claude 3.5 Haiku is cheaper on list price. Claude 3.5 Haiku costs $0.8/M input and $4.0/M output tokens. Mistral Large 2 (Nov '24) costs $2.0/M input and $6.0/M output tokens. On combined list price, Claude 3.5 Haiku is 1.7x cheaper than Mistral Large 2 (Nov '24). However, list prices alone can be misleading because different models use different numbers of tokens for the same task. Check the effective cost comparison above, which adjusts for token efficiency using benchmark data.

Which scores higher on benchmarks, Claude 3.5 Haiku or Mistral Large 2 (Nov '24)?

Claude 3.5 Haiku has a higher Intelligence Index (18.7) compared to Mistral Large 2 (Nov '24) (15.1). The Intelligence Index is a composite score from three industry-standard benchmarks: MMLU-Pro (general knowledge and reasoning), GPQA (graduate-level science), and AIME (mathematical problem solving). A higher score means the model produces more accurate and capable responses across a broad range of tasks. This composite approach is more reliable than any single benchmark because it measures different types of capability.

Which model is better value for money, Claude 3.5 Haiku or Mistral Large 2 (Nov '24)?

Claude 3.5 Haiku offers better value at $0.26 per intelligence point compared to Mistral Large 2 (Nov '24) at $0.53 per intelligence point. Cost per intelligence point measures how much you pay for each unit of benchmark performance, calculated as the combined token cost divided by the Intelligence Index score. When token efficiency data is available, this calculation uses effective prices (adjusted for the fact that different models consume different numbers of tokens for the same task) rather than raw list prices. A lower cost per intelligence point means you get more capability per dollar.

Which has a larger context window, Claude 3.5 Haiku or Mistral Large 2 (Nov '24)?

Claude 3.5 Haiku supports 200,000 tokens compared to Mistral Large 2 (Nov '24) with 128,000 tokens. The context window determines how much text (including your prompt, conversation history, and documents) the model can process in a single request. A larger context window is important for tasks like document summarization, long-form analysis, and multi-turn conversations with extensive history. If your use case involves processing large inputs, the context window may be a deciding factor.

Related Comparisons

Stop guessing. Start measuring.

Create an account, install the SDK, and see your first margin data in minutes.

See My Margin Data

No credit card required